I don’t get it. If I’m just going to a web page with picture (say a blog) it’s a far step to assume that I have JavaScript, just to display text and pictures.
Let’s say I am at work/wherever and the policy there is that JavaScript is disabled for (valid) precise security reasons. Then I can’t see the images because they are loaded through javascript. A good lazy-loading method should add value for people who have javascript enabled but should not remove all value for people who have it disabled.
Comments
by hugo about 6 years ago · link
This really sucks. What about users who don’t have javascript for whatever reason?
reply
by basti about 6 years ago · link
If you're running a JavaScript application, it can be assumed that you have JavaScript.
reply
by hugo about 6 years ago · link
I don’t get it. If I’m just going to a web page with picture (say a blog) it’s a far step to assume that I have JavaScript, just to display text and pictures.
Let’s say I am at work/wherever and the policy there is that JavaScript is disabled for (valid) precise security reasons. Then I can’t see the images because they are loaded through javascript. A good lazy-loading method should add value for people who have javascript enabled but should not remove all value for people who have it disabled.
reply